Moderators "very severe" Site R & E, where I posted my nice kosher pig had published the following comment that I received the figure is not possible properly wipe my.
I'll do it here.
From Anonymous:
Hello Mr. Niesche,
I'll go straight to the point: This article is a vulgarity and inconsistency repulsive. A journalistomane of the 30 pre-collaborationist tendencies did not produce worse cloth. And I do not speak of "humor" that emerges, I still laugh ... "High Land", really, she is very good. "Grouink" excellent: I have not heard better since the current primary school. And yet, I attended a primary school in a fairly good: there was still learning to write properly. Words.
Niesche Sir, you do not go to E & R service, believe me please. A bit of elevation and fresh air, a bit of style and depth, all this would do no harm and even bring your "argument" this indescribable whose absence gives your blatant about an air of ridicule redolent assumed mediocrity.
I need to say that I have no sympathy, even distant, with Mr. "Grouink? I might still order not to open to your criticism so precise.
All this is unfortunate, because, before reading this rag, I verily I say unto you, about to join E and R (even if I am Belgian). I was a click, my finger was only one centimeter of the left mouse button, hair on penis (finger it please you ...).
Let me anyway (given that this message will probably not be published, you'll be very kind to the board; careful not big - again) to congratulate Mr. Alain Soral for his work and his courage. I dare not think he reads all the articles published here.
Vive la France libre.
§ This gentleman seeks first clearly and inexpensively, to give the look of distinction.
But under the mask, the Philistine, laborious sweats.
Alas, all the rest of the text full of vulgarity (the real one) of the trivial scat jokes with which the dullness of the author tries to join, and what tone! (We have not kept pigs together!), denies the only sentence that could have held some " this indescribable whose absence gives your blatant about an air of ridicule smelling good mediocrity assumed. "if it was a vulgar plagiarism *
§ It is in this flat and bland philippic an aspect of literary criticism ... if you want. Thereupon nothing to say, I'm not accustomed to defend myself: my task is not to comment on the comments.
Literary criticism is still in ex-France, and I even believe in Belchic (it is I again), and more generally in all countries of dishes all dishes prose writers who have the understanding down the elevation spirit to earth.
Otherwise they would that he, the poor ones? Thus they write
a poet as they would write to their MP: with a spirit of seriousness and good taste, with thinly veiled threats (you will not have my click), the constant shifts of dignity, offset (they believe) by plagiarism and sober remarks, both tasted all the curators, the dentists of the UMP, the keepers of the medicine Homais sir.
§ let each judge, "grouink and High Landes' are the only two things I be charged for the crime of lese-majesty of style, perhaps childish (I'm willing to grouiiiiiink), designated a disapproving finger by this vulgar piece.
As one commentator has noted this comment: "Your pseudo-speech rebel feels jealousy, full nose, you would be required to possess such a" style ". Me I found the article very well written and full of subtleties very funny - much more class - your self-centered speech where you can learn with joy that you have attended a good primary school .. (It's great but did you continue your studies then?) "
§ At primary school he was already lifting a finger aloft, the man hanging on his finger.
For this immortal " finger which was only a click ", " that was only one centimeter of the left mouse button, hair on penis !" Should become a Major anthology, the standard master fingers of honor between the ups and downs.
But if this index has puzzled bristles touched the little gray mouse, he left his annoyingly sty smell of the remugles this "big board" (ugh! Here the kind of big disgusting claiming " A little elevation and fresh air ") that permeates everything so carefully wiped comment.
§ For reading this board threatening, we see the eye shine of the sponsor. It is here, something beyond literary criticism. The above, not above it, but exceeds, as a string over an unprepossessing underwear no less suspect. With a creeping insidious, crafty, with constant licking which raise the heart, with a sort of blackmail this gentleman properly accuse of "collaborating"!
§ There is a indecency, there is an impropriety, it is not just a lack of talent, but there is an indignity, such that a spineless character, who can tackle a Association without first to kowtow to the president, such a servile and who can not read, accuse me of mediocrity vichyssoise.
§ And there is not just this impropriety, so agreed, it gets worse, a coward with no name and a terrible insult to heap opprobrium of pre-collaborationist tendencies , nostalgic fascist at anyone who dares to attack the current domination.
§ These people, neo-fascists in Europe, are pigs, who do I?
The baseness would have me, not what I denounce? Collaboration (the real one there) with the worst barbarity of our times.
So this barbarity she continues to harden lead, while the good conscience of those cowardly me yawn with their beautiful lessons of decency, as if decency was still in the appointment, ; neat and not irreparably tainted. In bloody rags in the killing fields of Palestine.
§ But maybe all the pigs they are not trying to whine in this part of Europe on the shores of Joudain. It is in this comment command, a message, which strangely comes about: what Felix Niesche does not it bad service to the association?
was exactly that, through other channels, an attempt was made recently, and cunningly, to make me understand.
Coincidence probably. Felix the Cat
* Aragon in his polemic with (or against?) Drieu .
0 comments:
Post a Comment